Post by Donny - Bucks on Jan 12, 2020 9:38:41 GMT
Queeley falls in line with the rest of the shooting guards from this class, all of whom have an argument but are still borderline for voters. However, Queeley's differences set him apart very positively, in my opinion. Will this be enough for him to get into the NBN Hall of Fame?
PLAYER PAGE - nothinbutnetleague.altervista.org/NothinButNet/2046/html/players/player554.htm
![]()
CAREER STATS
Games: 1,381
MPG: 35.3
PPG: 22.5
RPG: 5.9
APG: 3.8
SPG: 1.5
BPG: 0.5
TOPG: 2.8
FG%: .468
FT%: .900
3P%: .438
Best Season (2039 Pistons)
Games: 81
MPG: 38.2
PPG: 29.7
RPG: 6.2
APG: 4.5
SPG: 1.5
BPG: 0.5
TOPG: 3.0
FG%: .470
FT%: .947
3P%: .442
Career Highs
Points: 64
Rebounds: 15
Assists: 12
Steals: 6
Blocks: 5
Achievements
Championships: 1
Player of the Game: 99
Player of the Week: 0
Player of the Month: 0
Double Doubles: 170
Triple Doubles: 1
Career Leaderboard Rankings
Games - 36 (1,381)
Points - 33 (31,072)
Steals - 86 (2,072)
FG - 37 (11,380)
FT - 61 (5,286)
3P - 29 (3,062)
Awards
2029 - All-Star Rookie Game Participant
2029 - All-Rookie Team
2030 - All-Star Rookie Game Participant
2042 - All-Star Game Participant
Arguments For Induction
- A .47/.90/.44 career is pretty freaking good. Queeley had a lot of very good seasons on a ridiculous amount of teams for a potentially Hall of Fame career.
- Queeley was always reliable and always did his job. While his achievements and trophy case won't tell you that, the Championship is a big testament to his ability, even with playing on the Spurs, Wizards, Grizz, Pistons, Blazers, Knicks, Jazz, Cavs, and Kings.
- Essentially speaking, his skill-set was something along the lines of flawless in the league. He didn't do everything EXTREMELY well, but he did do a good job with just about everything. Shot well, rebounded well, defended well, passed well.
Arguments Against Induction
- As has been stated with the prior SG Hall of Fame nominees in this class, this is the Hall of Fame and not Hall of "Very Good but not Necessarily Great". Another SG career that statistically blends in with a lot of the other fantastic SG's.
- Not sure if Queeley was ever much of a "star" in anything outside of scoring, which is a blessing and a curse. Not having the extra "star defender" or "star ball handler" hurts the case.
- Does Queeley stack up that overwhelmingly well against prior and present candidates? Depending upon what you like out of a player, Sharman was a significantly better defender and Dort was a more "high-level" player in the long run.
Vote carefully, and remember to throw out arguments regardless of which side you're on. This should be a discussion that eventually gets the league to the proper decision on him. Your vote can also be retracted after it's been cast if you feel like switching to the other side based on the arguments that have been made. To be inducted, a player needs 70% and to be considered in a later class they need 50%. Vote carefully.
***BONUS - Don't forget that everyone who votes gets $25 and the person that makes the best argument or contributes to the discussion the best will be awarded an extra $25***
PLAYER PAGE - nothinbutnetleague.altervista.org/NothinButNet/2046/html/players/player554.htm
CAREER STATS
Games: 1,381
MPG: 35.3
PPG: 22.5
RPG: 5.9
APG: 3.8
SPG: 1.5
BPG: 0.5
TOPG: 2.8
FG%: .468
FT%: .900
3P%: .438
Best Season (2039 Pistons)
Games: 81
MPG: 38.2
PPG: 29.7
RPG: 6.2
APG: 4.5
SPG: 1.5
BPG: 0.5
TOPG: 3.0
FG%: .470
FT%: .947
3P%: .442
Career Highs
Points: 64
Rebounds: 15
Assists: 12
Steals: 6
Blocks: 5
Achievements
Championships: 1
Player of the Game: 99
Player of the Week: 0
Player of the Month: 0
Double Doubles: 170
Triple Doubles: 1
Career Leaderboard Rankings
Games - 36 (1,381)
Points - 33 (31,072)
Steals - 86 (2,072)
FG - 37 (11,380)
FT - 61 (5,286)
3P - 29 (3,062)
Awards
2029 - All-Star Rookie Game Participant
2029 - All-Rookie Team
2030 - All-Star Rookie Game Participant
2042 - All-Star Game Participant
Arguments For Induction
- A .47/.90/.44 career is pretty freaking good. Queeley had a lot of very good seasons on a ridiculous amount of teams for a potentially Hall of Fame career.
- Queeley was always reliable and always did his job. While his achievements and trophy case won't tell you that, the Championship is a big testament to his ability, even with playing on the Spurs, Wizards, Grizz, Pistons, Blazers, Knicks, Jazz, Cavs, and Kings.
- Essentially speaking, his skill-set was something along the lines of flawless in the league. He didn't do everything EXTREMELY well, but he did do a good job with just about everything. Shot well, rebounded well, defended well, passed well.
Arguments Against Induction
- As has been stated with the prior SG Hall of Fame nominees in this class, this is the Hall of Fame and not Hall of "Very Good but not Necessarily Great". Another SG career that statistically blends in with a lot of the other fantastic SG's.
- Not sure if Queeley was ever much of a "star" in anything outside of scoring, which is a blessing and a curse. Not having the extra "star defender" or "star ball handler" hurts the case.
- Does Queeley stack up that overwhelmingly well against prior and present candidates? Depending upon what you like out of a player, Sharman was a significantly better defender and Dort was a more "high-level" player in the long run.
Vote carefully, and remember to throw out arguments regardless of which side you're on. This should be a discussion that eventually gets the league to the proper decision on him. Your vote can also be retracted after it's been cast if you feel like switching to the other side based on the arguments that have been made. To be inducted, a player needs 70% and to be considered in a later class they need 50%. Vote carefully.
***BONUS - Don't forget that everyone who votes gets $25 and the person that makes the best argument or contributes to the discussion the best will be awarded an extra $25***
*
