|
Post by pjclippers on Jan 22, 2021 6:05:36 GMT
I think Slough could have a good plan with the super sub but I don't like the SF downgrade! I thought he could've had Hardy cheaper. Doubtful, esp after I scouted him
|
|
|
Post by Donny - Bucks on Jan 22, 2021 6:08:59 GMT
I think Slough could have a good plan with the super sub but I don't like the SF downgrade! I thought he could've had Hardy cheaper. Doubtful, esp after I scouted him Surprising! 8.5.6
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Jan 22, 2021 12:25:58 GMT
Could always just start Williams/Hardy together if you really feeling yourself.
Hardy as supersub and hopefully 1st option would be the way to go. He would still get 30+ mins and I am sure he will still score nicely.
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Jan 22, 2021 12:35:17 GMT
Also just looking on straight production Woodard and Tatum are doing similar stuff. Woodard is giving out the most scoring production he has in years while Tatum is off from what he usually does. Woodard is getting to the line plenty too. I actually feel this deal makes the spurs better.
|
|
|
Post by ucfinfan86 on Jan 22, 2021 13:57:57 GMT
I think adding Hardy as a super sub makes Spurs a lot better
|
|
|
Post by ucfinfan86 on Jan 22, 2021 15:41:10 GMT
Wish I had the matching expirings to make a run at Tatum. My backup SF stinks and there are none available
|
|
|
Post by carmelo115 on Jan 22, 2021 15:57:27 GMT
Wish I had the matching expirings to make a run at Tatum. My backup SF stinks and there are none available BACKUP!!!
|
|
|
Post by A. Silver on Jan 22, 2021 17:27:54 GMT
I think Clippers get the most value here, but at last place in the division without their pick Spurs had to do something.
|
|
|
Post by A. Silver on Jan 23, 2021 2:22:20 GMT
done
|
|
|
Post by SpikeLee14 on Jan 29, 2021 11:35:44 GMT
Bump no cash
Done
|
|