|
Post by jjbarea on Jul 14, 2021 21:01:46 GMT
I don’t think anyone would swap a top 3 pick for Walt Davis right now. In a good draft no but this isn't Davis: B B C+ A- C A If he was in the draft you wouldn't take him with the 1st pick? I would take him #1 but that’s just me
|
|
|
Post by frosty on Jul 14, 2021 21:14:03 GMT
Id offer #1 but he has a boring name. Hes got nothing on Sir Sidney El Sid the Squid Moncrief.
|
|
|
Post by Donny - Bucks on Jul 14, 2021 21:14:56 GMT
In a good draft no but this isn't Davis: B B C+ A- C A If he was in the draft you wouldn't take him with the 1st pick? I would take him #1 but that’s just me If he was B B C+ A- C A without having any of his rookie contract bled out, sure. However, he's 2 years away from leaving to a better team in free agency. 10.1.1
|
|
|
Post by jjbarea on Jul 14, 2021 21:15:27 GMT
Id offer #1 but he has a boring name. Hes got nothing on Sir Sidney El Sid the Squid Moncrief. Marketing is important. who’s going to sell more shoes? Walter or Sir Sid the Sloth?
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Jul 14, 2021 21:42:55 GMT
I would take him #1 but that’s just me If he was B B C+ A- C A without having any of his rookie contract bled out, sure. However, he's 2 years away from leaving to a better team in free agency. 10.1.1 Still going around what you said but it's ok. 2 years of camps and development looks better than almost everyone in this draft.
|
|
|
Post by Donny - Bucks on Jul 14, 2021 21:49:04 GMT
If he was B B C+ A- C A without having any of his rookie contract bled out, sure. However, he's 2 years away from leaving to a better team in free agency. 10.1.1 Still going around what you said but it's ok. 2 years of camps and development looks better than almost everyone in this draft. "The prospect I will draft at #2 will be more valuable than anyone on your team" I never said he would immediately be better but value-wise, it's not even close? 10.1.1
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Jul 14, 2021 21:53:10 GMT
Still going around what you said but it's ok. 2 years of camps and development looks better than almost everyone in this draft. "The prospect I will draft at #2 will be more valuable than anyone on your team" I never said he would immediately be better but value-wise, it's not even close? 10.1.1 No I don't think it is. What you saying though will be more valuable so how does that not consistent of right now? It's like what would you rather have #2 pick or Davis I think they choose Davis and now if you said the person I draft will become more valuable then you can play that twist but not what you said. It's cool though love messing with you
|
|
|
Post by A. Silver on Jul 14, 2021 21:56:35 GMT
I'm with yourkers, I'd take Davis over the 2 pick in this draft.
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Jul 14, 2021 21:59:10 GMT
Still going around what you said but it's ok. 2 years of camps and development looks better than almost everyone in this draft. "The prospect I will draft at #2 will be more valuable than anyone on your team" I never said he would immediately be better but value-wise, it's not even close? 10.1.1 You're right it's not even close.
|
|
|
Post by jjbarea on Jul 14, 2021 22:00:23 GMT
I'm with yourkers, I'd take Davis over the 2 pick in this draft. Silver has spoken
|
|
|
Post by jjbarea on Jul 14, 2021 22:02:16 GMT
"The prospect I will draft at #2 will be more valuable than anyone on your team" I never said he would immediately be better but value-wise, it's not even close? 10.1.1 No I don't think it is. What you saying though will be more valuable so how does that not consistent of right now? It's like what would you rather have #2 pick or Davis I think they choose Davis and now if you said the person I draft will become more valuable then you can play that twist but not what you said. It's cool though love messing with you Well said. hunt54 loves to push buttons too
|
|
|
Post by Donny - Bucks on Jul 14, 2021 22:08:41 GMT
"The prospect I will draft at #2 will be more valuable than anyone on your team" I never said he would immediately be better but value-wise, it's not even close? 10.1.1 No I don't think it is. What you saying though will be more valuable so how does that not consistent of right now? It's like what would you rather have #2 pick or Davis I think they choose Davis and now if you said the person I draft will become more valuable then you can play that twist but not what you said. It's cool though love messing with you I don't see anything special in Davis. B B scoring after two years means he's relying heavily on TC help to progress him, whereas guys in the draft haven't seen a single TC yet, likely have higher potential, and some already have similar scoring ability. On Rog's draft preview, Davis was a 58.6 prospect and over two years of camps and TC's, he's been a +1 inside and a +2 outside, which is extremely underwhelming imo. Also, the A- defense is cool but his stocks aren't really A- good, so he may be loaded with athletics or drive D. I'd take the chance that the 2nd best prospect in the upcoming draft will be better than a SF who is B B after 2 years. Mike Mitchell is B- B- with C+ defense and I'm fairly sure whoever gets him, assuming his potential is fine, could make him better than Davis after 2 years. 10.1.1
|
|
|
Post by frosty on Jul 14, 2021 22:14:56 GMT
I'm with yourkers, I'd take Davis over the 2 pick in this draft. Silver has spoken ive been questioning Silvers judgement since the Vegas Bobcats incident
|
|
|
Post by jjbarea on Jul 14, 2021 22:16:17 GMT
ive been questioning Silvers judgement since the Vegas Bobcats incident I’m still convinced that the Vegas Bobcats would’ve been great for the league
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Jul 14, 2021 22:23:14 GMT
Pistol pete year 2 was B- B B B+ C A.
|
|