|
|
Post by mcmuslim on Jan 2, 2024 5:20:59 GMT
Haha. Def has changed a bit since this class was made there How long are we going until it's back to the 50's? nah fr where’s tungsten johnson mcdavid with 95 strength off the bat idc about these gen z kids |
|
|
|
Post by SpikeLee14 on Jan 2, 2024 13:56:04 GMT
2 of the 6 guys I wanted to declare declared so that blows lol need some lotto magic
|
|
|
|
Post by StayMe7o on Jan 3, 2024 19:04:22 GMT
Why did Aday Mara declare twice?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Jan 4, 2024 6:00:56 GMT
Why did Aday Mara declare twice? Good question. Went off two lists at a point. He should be 19. Thats the one that declared haha |
|
|
|
Post by carmelo115 on Jan 4, 2024 15:39:17 GMT
Are we doing draft notes?
|
|
|
|
Post by vanimmer on Jan 4, 2024 15:51:44 GMT
Are we doing draft notes? I really hope so. Nothing to spectacular and easy tonfollow up but i Love those. |
|
|
|
Post by carmelo115 on Jan 4, 2024 15:57:14 GMT
Are we doing draft notes? I really hope so. Nothing to spectacular and easy tonfollow up but i Love those. I agree, always one of my favorite parts of this league |
|
|
|
Post by SpikeLee14 on Jan 4, 2024 16:01:59 GMT
I really hope so. Nothing to spectacular and easy tonfollow up but i Love those. I agree, always one of my favorite parts of this league One of the league jobs is draft more organizer so I would assume so. These are always fun |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Jan 4, 2024 17:56:55 GMT
Yes, we'll have notes in a scaled back way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Jan 4, 2024 19:52:02 GMT
Also just so everyone knows, I'm trying to keep the league in a similar state ratings wise as things are right now. Between the camping system and FBB I don't know how that will last, but some general notions to get used to:
C+ outside=above average, B- is great, and anything over that is elite.
C+ rebounding=above average, B- is great , and anything over that is elite.
I have to make the internationals still, which will add a good bit of the top end talent but I currently have only 2 guys with B- rebounding and none higher, 10 guys with C+ or higher. We currently have 3 guys with B- outside and none higher, and 15 guys with C+ or higher but that number will fluctuate a bit because I normally trend higher initially on shooting and then bring it down.
Inside scoring, handles, and defense will not be monitored in that way. In fact I will probably try to keep defense somewhat higher to combat scoring inflation and inside scoring is hard to keep down as strength and jumping play such a heavy role in that. Example is you can give a guy 50 inside, 50 strength, and 80 jumping at SF and hes already C+ inside. Bump the inside to 55 and it becomes B-. Anyone who has done FBB long enough knows that inside is prolly the hardest overall rating to read because of the impact strength/jumping have on it and their lack of tangible effects statistically.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Jan 4, 2024 19:59:59 GMT
Also just so everyone knows, I'm trying to keep the league in a similar state ratings wise as things are right now. Between the camping system and FBB I don't know how that will last, but some general notions to get used to: C+ outside=above average, B- is great, and anything over that is elite. C+ rebounding=above average, B- is great , and anything over that is elite. I have to make the internationals still, which will add a good bit of the top end talent but I currently have only 2 guys with B- rebounding and none higher, 10 guys with C+ or higher. We currently have 3 guys with B- outside and none higher, and 15 guys with C+ or higher but that number will fluctuate a bit because I normally trend higher initially on shooting and then bring it down. Inside scoring, handles, and defense will not be monitored in that way. In fact I will probably try to keep defense somewhat higher to combat scoring inflation and inside scoring is hard to keep down as strength and jumping play such a heavy role in that. Example is you can give a guy 50 inside, 50 strength, and 80 jumping at SF and hes already C+ inside. Bump the inside to 55 and it becomes B-. Anyone who has done FBB long enough knows that inside is prolly the hardest overall rating to read because of the impact strength/jumping have on it and their lack of tangible effects statistically. I don't think with the current camping system and toned down notes that it should be a real problem. With so many modern players being point forward id be in favor of some notes or a camp to allow them to run whatever position. that would be hard to implement now tho, and shouldn't be much of a problem moving forward. |
|
|
|
Post by SpikeLee14 on Jan 4, 2024 20:36:34 GMT
Also just so everyone knows, I'm trying to keep the league in a similar state ratings wise as things are right now. Between the camping system and FBB I don't know how that will last, but some general notions to get used to: C+ outside=above average, B- is great, and anything over that is elite. C+ rebounding=above average, B- is great , and anything over that is elite. I have to make the internationals still, which will add a good bit of the top end talent but I currently have only 2 guys with B- rebounding and none higher, 10 guys with C+ or higher. We currently have 3 guys with B- outside and none higher, and 15 guys with C+ or higher but that number will fluctuate a bit because I normally trend higher initially on shooting and then bring it down. Inside scoring, handles, and defense will not be monitored in that way. In fact I will probably try to keep defense somewhat higher to combat scoring inflation and inside scoring is hard to keep down as strength and jumping play such a heavy role in that. Example is you can give a guy 50 inside, 50 strength, and 80 jumping at SF and hes already C+ inside. Bump the inside to 55 and it becomes B-. Anyone who has done FBB long enough knows that inside is prolly the hardest overall rating to read because of the impact strength/jumping have on it and their lack of tangible effects statistically. Why wouldn’t we just aim for what we had before? I don’t really see the difference if a shooter has A- outside if he’s playing against guys with B B+ defense compared to now with B- outside playing against C C+ defense. Just a thought and speaking on it wanted to hear some feedback. If you’re telling me C+ is above average then I don’t see anyone ever getting to A A+ in any rating in the future |
|
|
|
Post by SpikeLee14 on Jan 4, 2024 20:37:49 GMT
Which staying away from A A+ may be the point but if you shift defense the same way it should all move parallel
|
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Jan 4, 2024 20:51:14 GMT
Also just so everyone knows, I'm trying to keep the league in a similar state ratings wise as things are right now. Between the camping system and FBB I don't know how that will last, but some general notions to get used to: C+ outside=above average, B- is great, and anything over that is elite. C+ rebounding=above average, B- is great , and anything over that is elite. I have to make the internationals still, which will add a good bit of the top end talent but I currently have only 2 guys with B- rebounding and none higher, 10 guys with C+ or higher. We currently have 3 guys with B- outside and none higher, and 15 guys with C+ or higher but that number will fluctuate a bit because I normally trend higher initially on shooting and then bring it down. Inside scoring, handles, and defense will not be monitored in that way. In fact I will probably try to keep defense somewhat higher to combat scoring inflation and inside scoring is hard to keep down as strength and jumping play such a heavy role in that. Example is you can give a guy 50 inside, 50 strength, and 80 jumping at SF and hes already C+ inside. Bump the inside to 55 and it becomes B-. Anyone who has done FBB long enough knows that inside is prolly the hardest overall rating to read because of the impact strength/jumping have on it and their lack of tangible effects statistically. Why wouldn’t we just aim for what we had before? I don’t really see the difference if a shooter has A- outside if he’s playing against guys with B B+ defense compared to now with B- outside playing against C C+ defense. Just a thought and speaking on it wanted to hear some feedback. If you’re telling me C+ is above average then I don’t see anyone ever getting to A A+ in any rating in the future with more inflated camps you could at least hedge against bad TCs. Now its really gonna be a TC/POT dice roll. Camping will help no doubt, but gonna be alot harder. |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Jan 4, 2024 21:21:59 GMT
Also just so everyone knows, I'm trying to keep the league in a similar state ratings wise as things are right now. Between the camping system and FBB I don't know how that will last, but some general notions to get used to: C+ outside=above average, B- is great, and anything over that is elite. C+ rebounding=above average, B- is great , and anything over that is elite. I have to make the internationals still, which will add a good bit of the top end talent but I currently have only 2 guys with B- rebounding and none higher, 10 guys with C+ or higher. We currently have 3 guys with B- outside and none higher, and 15 guys with C+ or higher but that number will fluctuate a bit because I normally trend higher initially on shooting and then bring it down. Inside scoring, handles, and defense will not be monitored in that way. In fact I will probably try to keep defense somewhat higher to combat scoring inflation and inside scoring is hard to keep down as strength and jumping play such a heavy role in that. Example is you can give a guy 50 inside, 50 strength, and 80 jumping at SF and hes already C+ inside. Bump the inside to 55 and it becomes B-. Anyone who has done FBB long enough knows that inside is prolly the hardest overall rating to read because of the impact strength/jumping have on it and their lack of tangible effects statistically. Why wouldn’t we just aim for what we had before? I don’t really see the difference if a shooter has A- outside if he’s playing against guys with B B+ defense compared to now with B- outside playing against C C+ defense. Just a thought and speaking on it wanted to hear some feedback. If you’re telling me C+ is above average then I don’t see anyone ever getting to A A+ in any rating in the future Doesn't scale like that, offense takes over at higher ratings in FBB. |
|
*
*