|
|
Post by vanimmer on Feb 28, 2024 20:52:56 GMT
Think y'all are underrating it a bit. Top 3 are stronger than last year, 4-15 are weaker, 16-45 is stronger. The top 3 are gonna be really really good. To balance the class the lotto beyond that was made a bit weaker. It's very, very comparable to last year. Also last year's class had a handful of people saying they were upset players appeared better than their rookies. And this one rates slightly better. Not sure what y'all want me to do haha It just sucks when tou dont have ghe lottoluck that a pick in the top10 looks soo average. If you miss out on the top 2-3 prizes the dropoff is really big |
|
|
|
Post by Ronin on Feb 28, 2024 21:05:39 GMT
Think y'all are underrating it a bit. Top 3 are stronger than last year, 4-15 are weaker, 16-45 is stronger. The top 3 are gonna be really really good. To balance the class the lotto beyond that was made a bit weaker. It's very, very comparable to last year. Also last year's class had a handful of people saying they were upset players appeared better than their rookies. And this one rates slightly better. Not sure what y'all want me to do haha You should do some B or C potential players who have solid ratings, not everyone should be a prospect. It would make the draft more interesting i think, like for example if Cooper was B potential would he drop out of Top 3? He'd still probably be there, but a raw A potential MIGHT (or might not) be better in 3 or 4 seasons so a team has to decide to take a more developed player over one who needs several seasons to develop. |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Feb 28, 2024 21:06:17 GMT
Think y'all are underrating it a bit. Top 3 are stronger than last year, 4-15 are weaker, 16-45 is stronger. The top 3 are gonna be really really good. To balance the class the lotto beyond that was made a bit weaker. It's very, very comparable to last year. Also last year's class had a handful of people saying they were upset players appeared better than their rookies. And this one rates slightly better. Not sure what y'all want me to do haha It’s not your fault. Not every draft class needs to be good or equal. im mainly looking in that 5-18 range because that’s where my picks are. There’s just so many flaws with all those guys. Most of these SGs with C outside are non starters. SF with no Reb/def. The PG class is fine. Some decent looking bigs I don't consider C a nonstarter anymore. That's only a +3 from B whichis absolutely fine in this league. B B guys can score 20 a game. And ideally I'm trying to make the league have guys who aren't shooters but are still good because we're not inundated with all A- outside scoring. I'll happily draft a C outside guy who does other things well and develop the outside. Bronny is gonna play better at SG than PG IMO but I wanted him to have PG eligibility. |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Feb 28, 2024 21:09:35 GMT
Think y'all are underrating it a bit. Top 3 are stronger than last year, 4-15 are weaker, 16-45 is stronger. The top 3 are gonna be really really good. To balance the class the lotto beyond that was made a bit weaker. It's very, very comparable to last year. Also last year's class had a handful of people saying they were upset players appeared better than their rookies. And this one rates slightly better. Not sure what y'all want me to do haha You should do some B or C potential players who have solid ratings, not everyone should be a prospect. It would make the draft more interesting i think, like for example if Cooper was B potential would he drop out of Top 3? He'd still probably be there, but a raw A potential MIGHT (or might not) be better in 3 or 4 seasons so a team has to decide to take a more developed player over one who needs several seasons to develop. Those guys exist in these classes. On my phone and don't remember how exactly I made guys but Clingan and Dickinson are both examples of this. All the 23+ guys are more developed than anyone outside of the top 3. The top 3 will always be filled with guys who are both developed and have potential. The rest of the class you have to make those decisions. Do you wish to have a guy with B inside or A potential? We have guys with B to B+ handles who prolly could be starters on teams lacking PGs. Don't really have those guys on the wings, sure but it was a pretty weak wing class so that's by design. |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Feb 28, 2024 21:10:24 GMT
Think y'all are underrating it a bit. Top 3 are stronger than last year, 4-15 are weaker, 16-45 is stronger. The top 3 are gonna be really really good. To balance the class the lotto beyond that was made a bit weaker. It's very, very comparable to last year. Also last year's class had a handful of people saying they were upset players appeared better than their rookies. And this one rates slightly better. Not sure what y'all want me to do haha It just sucks when tou dont have ghe lottoluck that a pick in the top10 looks soo average. If you miss out on the top 2-3 prizes the dropoff is really big I get that. Gonna have top heavy classes and gonna suck when you miss out on the top top, but I still think you end up with a good prospect. |
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Mar 7, 2024 17:32:09 GMT
Magic- $1800+ $100 for discussion+ $200 responses= $2100
Hornets- $50
Hawks- $100
Wolves- $75
Thunder- $75
Grizz- $100
Spurs- $50
Lakers- $50
|
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Mar 7, 2024 18:02:44 GMT
Added
|
|
*
