|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 21, 2024 22:16:23 GMT
I’ll tell you what I think their trade value is best case and most likely if you want but won’t broadcast unless you want me too if its less or equal to than what I just posted theres no point |
|
|
|
Post by Charles on Mar 21, 2024 22:53:07 GMT
I’ll tell you what I think their trade value is best case and most likely if you want but won’t broadcast unless you want me too do it xD |
|
|
|
Post by leflop on Mar 21, 2024 22:57:54 GMT
Robert Williams isn't overpaid and is 10/10/2 big with minutes. Heat won't offer anything because "hEs ExPiRiNg" and Pelicans won't give more than $400 for him, so yeah I'd just rather keep him? i don't even want robert williams dude. out of all the bigs i wanted from your roster he's the least interesting one, and i never made him a requirement in our trades during our horrendous trade talks. and yes, the reason i wanted him the least is because he was expiring. i'll give you that. i have zero interest in robert williams right now and i am not in the market for a player like him. if any other gm is reading this, I am not a bidder for that player and will not be moving forward. hopefully you manage to swindle someone into looking at your bigs the same way you do, though. |
|
|
|
Post by leflop on Mar 21, 2024 22:59:05 GMT
on the record, i don't want claxton either. i think his value is negative.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Mar 21, 2024 23:25:14 GMT
on the record, i don't want claxton either. i think his value is negative. This is just an awful take. Like you purposefully traded for Siakam but Claxton, who gives actual value defensively and on the boards, has negative value? Like if this is what Knicks is running into, I get the frustration. Claxton is legit good. Hes a bit overpaid, hence why I think its going to be tough to trade him, but the money is fake. He could literally fit in your hard cap room and make your team substantially better than giving Siakam minutes would. |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Mar 21, 2024 23:27:09 GMT
I haven't gotten one good offer for any of my guys... Robert Williams isn't overpaid and is 10/10/2 big with minutes. Heat won't offer anything because "hEs ExPiRiNg" and Pelicans won't give more than $400 for him, so yeah I'd just rather keep him? I won't even get started with Claxton... I have only gotten offered 1 shit pick and for me I think he's more valuable than that. Overpaid or not. You can't just extrapolate shit and think thats what he'd be. I think Robert Williams has minimal value. Maybe more than $400, but not much though my opinion on cash is that its only worth what the person trading for it values it. You can make pretty unlimited cash here with minimal time. But I wouldn't give a pick for Robert Williams if i was competing. Hes an average at best 3rd big. I'm with you on Claxton though. |
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 21, 2024 23:32:39 GMT
I mean he's saying Claxton whos 26 is negative value but AD whos 6 years older and making 70M a year is untouchable so theres not much to say here...
I got Grimes for $750 cash which was what he was probably worth... I believe Robert Williams is at least worth 1,000 to a team trying to compete or at least a shit late 20s pick.
I don't have my pick next year as well so just moving them for cheap doesn't really help me.
|
|
|
|
Post by leflop on Mar 21, 2024 23:43:33 GMT
on the record, i don't want claxton either. i think his value is negative. This is just an awful take. Like you purposefully traded for Siakam but Claxton, who gives actual value defensively and on the boards, has negative value? Like if this is what Knicks is running into, I get the frustration. Claxton is legit good. Hes a bit overpaid, hence why I think its going to be tough to trade him, but the money is fake. He could literally fit in your hard cap room and make your team substantially better than giving Siakam minutes would. if test simming was a thing here, i bet you that on average, my team is way better with siakam as a 3rd big over claxton. call my take awful if you want, but claxton at that contract value does not contribute to winning as much as siakam would in the specific settings that i'm running. i can find replacement level claxtons if necessary for a 4/5th big for my playstyle, but finding a replacement for siakam is much harder for what i'm running. people are going to run themselves ragged here for b+/b+ defense level bigs and those teams who get them at sub 15 million deals will be way more successful than throwing 20%+ cap at someone like claxton, especially when there's no guards here to can defend the overpowered guards in this file. these bigs can't stop those guards, so why bother. i appreciate your input but i think you are dead wrong on claxton's value. looking at bigs here purely on defensive value in this meta on this file to justify a salary more than 10% of your cap is just plain wrong, and i have no interest in trading for williams and try to defend his resigning rights for a salary more than 15m. |
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 21, 2024 23:49:03 GMT
This is just an awful take. Like you purposefully traded for Siakam but Claxton, who gives actual value defensively and on the boards, has negative value? Like if this is what Knicks is running into, I get the frustration. Claxton is legit good. Hes a bit overpaid, hence why I think its going to be tough to trade him, but the money is fake. He could literally fit in your hard cap room and make your team substantially better than giving Siakam minutes would. if test simming was a thing here, i bet you that on average, my team is way better with siakam as a 3rd big over claxton. call my take awful if you want, but claxton at that contract value does not contribute to winning as much as siakam would in the specific settings that i'm running. i can find replacement level claxtons if necessary for a 4/5th big for my playstyle, but finding a replacement for siakam is much harder for what i'm running. people are going to run themselves ragged here for b+/b+ defense level bigs and those teams who get them at sub 15 million deals will be way more successful than throwing 20%+ cap at someone like claxton, especially when there's no guards here to can defend the overpowered guards in this file. these bigs can't stop those guards, so why bother. i appreciate your input but i think you are dead wrong on claxton's value. looking at bigs here purely on defensive value in this meta on this file to justify a salary more than 10% of your cap is just plain wrong, and i have no interest in trading for williams and try to defend his resigning rights for a salary more than 15m. serious question..... are you high? |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Mar 21, 2024 23:52:55 GMT
This is just an awful take. Like you purposefully traded for Siakam but Claxton, who gives actual value defensively and on the boards, has negative value? Like if this is what Knicks is running into, I get the frustration. Claxton is legit good. Hes a bit overpaid, hence why I think its going to be tough to trade him, but the money is fake. He could literally fit in your hard cap room and make your team substantially better than giving Siakam minutes would. if test simming was a thing here, i bet you that on average, my team is way better with siakam as a 3rd big over claxton. call my take awful if you want, but claxton at that contract value does not contribute to winning as much as siakam would in the specific settings that i'm running. i can find replacement level claxtons if necessary for a 4/5th big for my playstyle, but finding a replacement for siakam is much harder for what i'm running. people are going to run themselves ragged here for b+/b+ defense level bigs and those teams who get them at sub 15 million deals will be way more successful than throwing 20%+ cap at someone like claxton, especially when there's no guards here to can defend the overpowered guards in this file. these bigs can't stop those guards, so why bother. i appreciate your input but i think you are dead wrong on claxton's value. looking at bigs here purely on defensive value in this meta on this file to justify a salary more than 10% of your cap is just plain wrong, and i have no interest in trading for williams and try to defend his resigning rights for a salary more than 15m.  I don't think I've seen a worse take since we've been back, congrats. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles on Mar 21, 2024 23:54:48 GMT
I’m into it and I want the Heat to win so much now lol
|
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 21, 2024 23:56:30 GMT
Look at Claxton's stats from Day 41-45 lol... His stats don't even show correctly cuz he was on the bench for the first 20 days....
hes been averaging 23/15 and 3.5bpg in like the last 3 sims
|
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 22, 2024 0:01:05 GMT
if test simming was a thing here, i bet you that on average, my team is way better with siakam as a 3rd big over claxton. call my take awful if you want, but claxton at that contract value does not contribute to winning as much as siakam would in the specific settings that i'm running. i can find replacement level claxtons if necessary for a 4/5th big for my playstyle, but finding a replacement for siakam is much harder for what i'm running. people are going to run themselves ragged here for b+/b+ defense level bigs and those teams who get them at sub 15 million deals will be way more successful than throwing 20%+ cap at someone like claxton, especially when there's no guards here to can defend the overpowered guards in this file. these bigs can't stop those guards, so why bother. i appreciate your input but i think you are dead wrong on claxton's value. looking at bigs here purely on defensive value in this meta on this file to justify a salary more than 10% of your cap is just plain wrong, and i have no interest in trading for williams and try to defend his resigning rights for a salary more than 15m. I don't think I've seen a worse take since we've been back, congrats. this is what I've been dealing with all season, now you know why I am how I am lmao |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Mar 22, 2024 0:01:42 GMT
Look at Claxton's stats from Day 41-45 lol... His stats don't even show correctly cuz he was on the bench for the first 20 days.... hes been averaging 23/15 and 3.5bpg in like the last 3 sims 18.5/12.8 and 1.8bpg the last three sims, but close enough |
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 22, 2024 0:21:18 GMT
Look at Claxton's stats from Day 41-45 lol... His stats don't even show correctly cuz he was on the bench for the first 20 days.... hes been averaging 23/15 and 3.5bpg in like the last 3 sims 18.5/12.8 and 1.8bpg the last three sims, but close enough lol i just counted days 41-44 n stopped lol i saw he was playing that well or better once i put him in lineup but still 19/13/2 negative value lol |
|
*
*