|
Post by buckeyeballa10 on May 9, 2016 15:12:22 GMT
I agree with what the Pacers said, think his numbers were inflated a bit from playing on a sub-par team. Another guy who had great averages, but def not hall of fame worthy.
|
|
|
Post by bigthunder on May 9, 2016 15:35:48 GMT
I voted no, he was a very solid player for a long time. He just didn't do enough to get himself into the HOF. No real awards or achievements to get him in.
|
|
|
Post by yellowjacket2 on May 9, 2016 15:50:39 GMT
Worse portfolio than AW so clearly a no here.
|
|
|
Post by A. Silver on May 9, 2016 16:48:37 GMT
I'm going to buck the trend and say yes for SAR. He wasn't an elite scorer through his entire career but he was at the beginning with 29, 25, 24, 26 ppg all in a row near the beginning of his career - plus he's one of the best rebounding small forwards of all time and also had an A+ in defense for most of his career.
|
|
|
Post by Rog on May 13, 2016 1:43:20 GMT
Have to say no to this one even though he played for us for a few seasons. Was never a guy that could be fully depended on and was not consistent as well. He had a few season where he was the best guy on the team but sidekick aside he could never carry the team forward. Most of his stats are padded up during this period so thats another reason why it may look good but it wasnt HOF worthy Claim the extra $25 for best contribution/case. SAR has been denied enshrinement and is not eligible in future years.
|
|