|
|
Post by Rog on May 13, 2016 1:48:58 GMT
I voted yes, because statistically there is not really much more that you could ask for from Nash. He was a top 15 scorer and he did it efficiently, while also becoming the 3rd best distributor in league history. If being in the top 15 in two separate categories is not enough to get in, then what kind of requirements are we going to place on induction? The lack of success in the win/loss column is alarming, but I cannot definitively say that it was due to Nash's shortcomings. Another thing that I think should be considered is that as a point guard, Nash averaged less turnovers per game than SAR, who is also up for induction. The position that handles the ball the most and he was less likely to turn the ball over than another nominee. His durability is also a big selling point. How many times has a season fallen apart due to an injury late in the season to a star player? Claim the extra $25 for best case/contribution. Steve Nash has garnered enough votes to be enshrined, and is now a Hall of Famer. |
|
|
|
Post by naterade on May 19, 2016 5:06:25 GMT
He gets my vote for yes.. Devastating floor general who collected a ton of accolades and was (almost) always on a winning team
|
|
*
