|
|
Post by bigthunder on Apr 30, 2015 16:44:50 GMT
I am going to skip the 2003 HOF Nominees. The only notable player in my opinion is Darrell Armstong. If David Robinson can't make it I don't think he will. Please let me know if you disagree or would like another player nominated from the 2003 retirement class.
|
|
|
|
Post by josephballin11 on May 1, 2015 11:48:40 GMT
I disagree!!! LET DARRELL IN!!! He put up great numbers and was robbed of an MVP in my opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by bigthunder on May 1, 2015 15:19:32 GMT
I disagree!!! LET DARRELL IN!!! He put up great numbers and was robbed of an MVP in my opinion Yes - he was a really good player and had good stats. But this is the Hall of Fame. He couldn't even make it into an all-star game. If more people back you up then we can nominate him. |
|
rr1582
Assistant Commish
Bookie
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1,159
|
Post by rr1582 on May 1, 2015 16:32:50 GMT
I am going to skip the 2003 HOF Nominees. The only notable player in my opinion is Darrell Armstong. If David Robinson can't make it I don't think he will. Please let me know if you disagree or would like another player nominated from the 2003 retirement class. I agree let's not put Armstrong up for debate right now. We can always reevaluate when there is more data/stats of the league & players currently. So we can have a better idea of what HOF type #'s look like or how the players stats of a similar ilk look like. I.E. Similar ratings shell & same situation in regards to whether they were doing it as a scoring option or w/o being one. Being an option really boosts the average scoring by a few PPG over production as a non option. JMO. |
|
*
