|
|
Post by The Slough on Jan 12, 2024 0:07:17 GMT
Bro, If Hayward started with the . to back up SG, you could have adapted him for another one and use him as your super sub PG/SG/SF. Start Miller and camp him, not to mention try DC's throughout the year and see how they play, not just saying Martin has a better defense, which maybe or maybe not does against Kawhi. You could have done the same thing with Bridges and make another super sub, especially if not playing him now, not to mention see how Ball plays at SG vs PG with your trade for Dinwiddie. I'm Just saying. I did start Ball at SG the first sim after the trade. Then Dinwiddie got injured the following sim, Ball cut his turnovers and we won 13 of 16 to make the playoffs. Bridges has been starting for me, but Williams is a better rebounder, so i am starting him against the Turner/ Robinson frontcourt to give me a better shot. Bridges wasnt very good against the Pacers, so I am bringing him off the bench. I wouldnt be backing him up at SF anyway with Hayward there. Miller sucks right now, playing him at all makes no sense. His shooting ratings are fine but he isn't shooting very well, so i think it is best to avoid playing him as much. Either way, in your words, i dont have much of a shot, so why not throw something else out for the DC? Did you not listen you could have spent 500 each to make Hayward and Bridges even better off the bench? The flexibility is huge. But yeah, at least you are looking at things and I get a response, that actually makes me feel like you are trying vs not, but I still don't understand the lineup and why you haven't played Miller more to be honest. |
|
|
|
Post by verysilentone on Jan 12, 2024 0:13:17 GMT
I did start Ball at SG the first sim after the trade. Then Dinwiddie got injured the following sim, Ball cut his turnovers and we won 13 of 16 to make the playoffs. Bridges has been starting for me, but Williams is a better rebounder, so i am starting him against the Turner/ Robinson frontcourt to give me a better shot. Bridges wasnt very good against the Pacers, so I am bringing him off the bench. I wouldnt be backing him up at SF anyway with Hayward there. Miller sucks right now, playing him at all makes no sense. His shooting ratings are fine but he isn't shooting very well, so i think it is best to avoid playing him as much. Either way, in your words, i dont have much of a shot, so why not throw something else out for the DC? Did you not listen you could have spent 500 each to make Hayward and Bridges even better off the bench? The flexibility is huge. But yeah, at least you are looking at things and I get a response, that actually makes me feel like you are trying vs not, but I still don't understand the lineup and why you haven't played Miller more to be honest. I started Miller for the majority of the season and he averaged 5 points per game. Honestly, i missed the rookie playing time bonus because around midseason, i looked and didnt see it as a camp. Maybe it was there but I looked like 3 times and didnt see it, so i thought I was in the clear to bench him. He missed the bonus by 1 game. I liked his potential. I like his scoring ratings, but he gives very little aside from that and his scoring hasn't been there so I decided to play Hayward and Martin more |
|
|
|
Post by The Slough on Jan 12, 2024 0:15:23 GMT
Did you not listen you could have spent 500 each to make Hayward and Bridges even better off the bench? The flexibility is huge. But yeah, at least you are looking at things and I get a response, that actually makes me feel like you are trying vs not, but I still don't understand the lineup and why you haven't played Miller more to be honest. I started Miller for the majority of the season and he averaged 5 points per game. Honestly, i missed the rookie playing time bonus because around midseason, i looked and didnt see it as a camp. Maybe it was there but I looked like 3 times and didnt see it, so i thought I was in the clear to bench him. He missed the bonus by 1 game. I liked his potential. I like his scoring ratings, but he gives very little aside from that and his scoring hasn't been there so I decided to play Hayward and Martin more Got to try different methods of strategy is all I can say. I try multiple all season long, not to mention options and pace, it all comes into play. |
|
|
|
Post by verysilentone on Jan 12, 2024 0:16:01 GMT
I benched Miller for sim 13 for the first time. He was my 3rd option for a lot of the start of the year.
By sim 13, I was in the playoff hunt and he was playing like shit, so i started messing with the SF lineup.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Slough on Jan 12, 2024 0:16:17 GMT
I have a hard time believing Miller in outside, fast pace with a top 3 option wouldn't be scoring 10ppg plus
|
|
|
|
Post by The Slough on Jan 12, 2024 0:20:18 GMT
I benched Miller for sim 13 for the first time. He was my 3rd option for a lot of the start of the year. By sim 13, I was in the playoff hunt and he was playing like shit, so i started messing with the SF lineup. Didn't you fall out of the playoff hunt after you benched him? |
|
|
|
Post by verysilentone on Jan 12, 2024 0:34:19 GMT
I benched Miller for sim 13 for the first time. He was my 3rd option for a lot of the start of the year. By sim 13, I was in the playoff hunt and he was playing like shit, so i started messing with the SF lineup. Didn't you fall out of the playoff hunt after you benched him? Im in the playoffs so i didnt fall out of the playoff hunt. I think things looked bleakest around sim 17-18 ish. |
|
|
|
Post by The Slough on Jan 12, 2024 1:45:58 GMT
Didn't you fall out of the playoff hunt after you benched him? Im in the playoffs so i didnt fall out of the playoff hunt. I think things looked bleakest around sim 17-18 ish. Since this is the most I think you have ever talked and responded, i'm going to go Touche, and I am overly happy you are trying to upset #1, have a strategy, and are backing it up. I can't hate on this activity one bit. I actually love this even If I disagree, this is what the league is about  verysilentone |
|
|
|
Post by The Slough on Jan 12, 2024 1:46:52 GMT
Lets go Hornets 4-2 over the Pacers!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by A. Silver on Jan 12, 2024 3:31:44 GMT
Uh oh, Hornets up 2-1 against the #1 seed. DC changes paid off??
|
|
|
|
Post by HF on Jan 12, 2024 12:19:36 GMT
These predictions are jokes
|
|
|
|
Post by StayMe7o on Jan 15, 2024 0:45:57 GMT
Lets go Hornets 4-2 over the Pacers!!!!! 4-3 |
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Jan 26, 2024 12:32:23 GMT
Raptors: $750+$150 discussion+$200 response= $1100
Pelicans: $750+$150 discussion+$200 response= $1100
Hornets: $200
Grizz: $50
Pacers: $200
Spurs: $50
Kings: $50
Heat: $50
|
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Jan 26, 2024 13:44:31 GMT
Added
|
|
*
