|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 20, 2024 21:05:39 GMT
Clippers sign Julian Phiillips 10m fa filler Clippers Receive: saddiq bey victor oladipo Knicks Receive Julian Phillips 10m fa filler Kobe Brown A. Silver allowed this was supposed to be jovic instead of saddiq bey but he was cut in first deal |
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Mar 20, 2024 21:11:39 GMT
This won't be allowed. Can't trade back a player after just getting them in a trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 20, 2024 21:14:01 GMT
1. This isnt the specific rule. None of these players are “valuable” 2. I even purposely asked A. Silver approval before posting this and he said sure |
|
|
|
Post by bigman on Mar 20, 2024 21:28:37 GMT
ok
|
|
|
|
Post by leflop on Mar 20, 2024 22:25:54 GMT
I don't understand. If bey wasn't supposed to be in the trade, why didn't clippers just sign another FA and keep bey, or used the freed slot from the jovic cut to sign a player to make the trade legal?
|
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 20, 2024 22:44:43 GMT
I don't understand. If bey wasn't supposed to be in the trade, why didn't clippers just sign another FA and keep bey, or used the freed slot from the jovic cut to sign a player to make the trade legal? It would of worked with Jovic but since he cut him unless silver just reverts the cut we couldn't sign anyone to clippers cuz they would lose their 40M capspace. |
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Mar 20, 2024 23:24:14 GMT
1. This isnt the specific rule. None of these players are “valuable” 2. I even purposely asked A. Silver approval before posting this and he said sure How is this not the specific rule? Doesn't really matter if Silver is allowing it(as I probably would given the nature of the last trade) but this is literally what the rule is for lmfao |
|
|
|
Post by ripkobebryant on Mar 20, 2024 23:41:04 GMT
1. This isnt the specific rule. None of these players are “valuable” 2. I even purposely asked A. Silver approval before posting this and he said sure How is this not the specific rule? Doesn't really matter if Silver is allowing it(as I probably would given the nature of the last trade) but this is literally what the rule is for lmfao Saddiq Bey wasn't supposed to be part of the deal. If Clippers didn't have 15 players and didnt cut Jovic for the deal we would of used him instead. trade checker was wrong and it was my fault for trusting it. Clippers never tended to move Bey and it was my fault that they did and he shouldn't be penalized for it. the rule says a player cannot be moved back and forth for salary reasons but he wasn't ever supposed to be in the deal if I had it right at first, he was a throw in, if I had him in the deal initially and just made the move again then I would understand. Again, Clippers wanted Bey back, I don't care whether it goes through or not but I specifically asked A. Silver about it before ever even posting it. This is Saddiq Bey we are talking about...... If I have to take the $50 fine for this to go through for Clippers sake I will. |
|
|
|
Post by A. Silver on Mar 20, 2024 23:58:44 GMT
The rule is for trading players back and forth to get around matching salaries in a trade, not because people couldn't do math and ended up trading away players they didn't want to because they cut the only guy with the salary to make it work.
|
|
|
|
Post by A. Silver on Mar 20, 2024 23:58:47 GMT
Done
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles on Mar 21, 2024 0:03:18 GMT
not because people couldn't do math and ended up trading away players they didn't want to because they cut the only guy with the salary to make it work. lmao Glad it all got figured out |
|
|
|
Post by SpikeLee14 on Mar 25, 2024 18:13:47 GMT
done
|
|
*
