|
Post by hunt54 on Apr 20, 2024 1:24:51 GMT
While the NBN is often a stage for remarkable feats and unexpected triumphs, it also witnesses instances where teams fall short of expectations. In the realm of professional basketball, underachievement can be just as noteworthy as success, shedding light on the challenges and complexities of the sport. Reflecting on the past season, several teams in the NBN found themselves struggling to meet statistical projections, falling short of anticipated success. 1. Toronto Raptors
Wins Under Proj: 5.999065 Actual Wins: 53 Projected Wins Based on Stats: 58.999065 Leading the pack of underachievers in the NBN are the Toronto Raptors, who finished the season with nearly six wins below their projected total. Despite fielding a talented roster and showcasing moments of brilliance, the Raptors struggled to translate potential into consistent success on the court. With 53 wins, the Raptors fell short of expectations, highlighting the challenges they faced in a competitive season. 2. Memphis GrizzliesWins Under Proj: 5.27303 Actual Wins: 56 Projected Wins Based on Stats: 61.27303 Following closely behind are the Memphis Grizzlies, who finished the season with over five wins below their projected total. Despite demonstrating flashes of promise and resilience throughout the season, the Grizzlies were unable to meet expectations, ultimately securing 56 wins. Their underwhelming performance underscores the difficulties they encountered in navigating the competitive landscape of the NBN. 3. Detroit Pistons
Wins Under Proj: 3.996171 Actual Wins: 47 Projected Wins Based on Stats: 50.996171 The Detroit Pistons found themselves grappling with underachievement, finishing the season with nearly four wins below their projected total. Despite their efforts to compete at a high level, the Pistons fell short of expectations, securing 47 victories. Their struggles on the court highlight the challenges they faced in a season filled with formidable opponents and intense competition. 4. Atlanta Hawks
Wins Under Proj: 3.914508 Actual Wins: 23 Projected Wins Based on Stats: 26.914508 The Atlanta Hawks endured a season marred by underachievement, finishing with nearly four wins below their projected total. Despite their best efforts to overcome obstacles and adversity, the Hawks struggled to find consistency and fell short of expectations with 23 wins. Their disappointing performance underscores the challenges they faced in a fiercely competitive NBN season. 5. Los Angeles Lakers
Wins Under Proj: 3.261966 Actual Wins: 48 Projected Wins Based on Stats: 51.261966 Rounding out the list of underachievers are the Los Angeles Lakers, who finished the season with over three wins below their projected total. Despite boasting a star-studded roster and high expectations, the Lakers were unable to meet anticipations, securing 48 victories. Their underwhelming performance highlights the complexities and unpredictability of the NBN, where even powerhouse teams can falter in the face of adversity. In conclusion, the past NBN season witnessed several teams grappling with underachievement, falling short of statistical projections and expectations. From the Toronto Raptors to the Los Angeles Lakers, these underachievers faced a myriad of challenges and obstacles in their quest for success. As the NBN continues to evolve, these teams serve as reminders of the unpredictable nature of professional basketball, where success is never guaranteed, and overcoming adversity requires resilience, determination, and unwavering commitment.
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Apr 20, 2024 1:34:29 GMT
Oh damn didn't expect to be 1st on the list lol. With all my trades team takes a minute to gel. But feel we are set this year and unless injuries come I see us sticking with what we have.
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Apr 20, 2024 1:35:23 GMT
So whats the rules for articles written by AI? Cuz leave it to fucking Hunt to open up a giant can of worms.
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Apr 20, 2024 1:36:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Apr 20, 2024 1:37:53 GMT
So whats the rules for articles written by AI? Cuz leave it to fucking Hunt to open up a giant can of worms. i have openly wrote them with AI the last few seasons and even put that it was wrote by AI and people were cool with it. If people aren't cool with it i can write instead and it will make the numbers more numbery and sound like shit. Im good either way
|
|
|
Post by cop5414 on Apr 20, 2024 1:38:11 GMT
Rename the article to "UC a big underperformer". Grizzlies and the Pistons
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Apr 20, 2024 1:40:11 GMT
So whats the rules for articles written by AI? Cuz leave it to fucking Hunt to open up a giant can of worms. They are negative points calculated, i forgot to add them to the article. regarding the AI is that against the rules? calculations / gathering the data i did myself. If its against the rules just give me the money for everything outside the commentary. I don't see any problem using AI to help generate content. I've looked into doing the same thing, which is how I could tell so easily that the blurbs were all AI generated.
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Apr 20, 2024 1:46:44 GMT
All I'll say is I have major issues with 100% AI written article getting more cash(in once instance) than camp tracking or grading all the articles or winning the title.
Silver okayed it. Alright. Moving on I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Apr 20, 2024 1:48:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Apr 20, 2024 1:50:00 GMT
To me its one thing to use AI to enhance stuff you've already written and even then I hate it. But its another thing entirely to do zero, and I mean in this instance ZERO, writing yourself.
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Apr 20, 2024 1:52:20 GMT
All I'll say is I have major issues with 100% AI written article getting more cash(in once instance) than camp tracking or grading all the articles or winning the title. Silver okayed it. Alright. Moving on I guess. how much are those jobs getting paid ( i looked i think its from 750-1000) I would agree with that on the AI part, in the last two articles cases i calculated the proj win total that number is 100 orignial. i think yourkers has done a good job, my last AI (it was pretty much ai only ) he gave me like 500 or 600 which is less than those jobs you stated. In articles with more statistical input he gave me more.
|
|
|
Post by ucfinfan86 on Apr 20, 2024 1:54:00 GMT
Rename the article to "UC a big underperformer". Grizzlies and the Pistons Sadly you’re not wrong
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Apr 20, 2024 1:54:03 GMT
All I'll say is I have major issues with 100% AI written article getting more cash(in once instance) than camp tracking or grading all the articles or winning the title. Silver okayed it. Alright. Moving on I guess. how much are those jobs getting paid ( i looked i think its from 750-1000) I would agree with that on the AI part, in the last two articles cases i calculated the proj win total that number is 100 orignial. i think yourkers has done a good job, my last AI (it was pretty much ai only ) he gave me like 500 or 600 which is less than those jobs you stated. In articles with more statistical input he gave me more. Yourkers is fine. Silver already okayed it. I'm not trying to start drama, so I'm gonna drop it.
|
|
|
Post by vanimmer on Apr 20, 2024 8:47:31 GMT
Im gonna get better Im gonna get better Il gonna get better Oke im done
|
|
|
Post by leflop on Apr 21, 2024 12:21:56 GMT
Wow 61 projected wins for the grizz is insane. I hope UC figures it out and gets them to within expectations.
|
|