|
Post by Donny - Bucks on Jun 14, 2022 18:19:48 GMT
Interesting that we went away from scouting, yet we still have to scout player stats. IMO that will hold things up just as much during the draft. I thought part of it was to eliminate having the Commish be present all the time to provide scouts? Thinking he’s got the links handy and can send them from wherever.
|
|
|
Post by Donny - Bucks on Jun 14, 2022 18:19:59 GMT
Don’t care. Just leave me some good 2nd rounders ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png) Good luck finding anyone with potential!
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jun 14, 2022 18:24:04 GMT
This actually makes it like a real draft. I feel we should get to see the pre draft without having to pay but now it's a crap shoot. Which the draft really is. I don't scout so I am ok with the ordeal and now you really have to think this over instead of comparing numbers to make sure you get it right. This tbh. I’d argue the previous system made it too transparent. I like the uncertainty, it’s what a draft should have.
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Jun 14, 2022 18:24:20 GMT
Interesting that we went away from scouting, yet we still have to scout player stats. IMO that will hold things up just as much during the draft. I thought part of it was to eliminate having the Commish be present all the time to provide scouts? Thinking he’s got the links handy and can send them from wherever. im not a math magician but wouldn't it be more links doing it this way than before ? each player + team + league leaders + awards ?
|
|
|
Post by carmelo115 on Jun 14, 2022 18:30:45 GMT
Thinking he’s got the links handy and can send them from wherever. im not a math magician but wouldn't it be more links doing it this way than before ? each player + team + league leaders + awards ? won't need the file on hand though
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Jun 14, 2022 18:38:49 GMT
im not a math magician but wouldn't it be more links doing it this way than before ? each player + team + league leaders + awards ? won't need the file on hand though i thought he was sending them as images my bad, if its real links that makes sense
|
|
|
Post by josephballin11 on Jun 14, 2022 18:46:02 GMT
Don’t care. Just leave me some good 2nd rounders ![:)](//storage2.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png) Good luck finding anyone with potential! Meh your being a little dramatic. B potential ranges from like 61 to 80 or some shit---There is plenty of room and will probably hold the majority of players in the draft. Unless they are a developed older guy
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Jun 14, 2022 18:48:05 GMT
Good luck finding anyone with potential! Meh your being a little dramatic. B potential ranges from like 61 to 80 or some shit---There is plenty of room and will probably hold the majority of players in the draft. Unless they are a developed older guy Diamond in the rough that 75-80 guy to 85-90 and you're golden
|
|
|
Post by josephballin11 on Jun 14, 2022 18:50:00 GMT
Meh your being a little dramatic. B potential ranges from like 61 to 80 or some shit---There is plenty of room and will probably hold the majority of players in the draft. Unless they are a developed older guy Diamond in the rough that 75-80 guy to 85-90 and you're golden Diamond in the rough is too good to use on Potential imo.
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Jun 14, 2022 18:50:18 GMT
Meh your being a little dramatic. B potential ranges from like 61 to 80 or some shit---There is plenty of room and will probably hold the majority of players in the draft. Unless they are a developed older guy Diamond in the rough that 75-80 guy to 85-90 and you're golden if its their highest rating then do the "do what you do " camp ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png)
|
|
|
Post by Rog on Jun 14, 2022 18:52:07 GMT
Diamond in the rough that 75-80 guy to 85-90 and you're golden Diamond in the rough is too good to use on Potential imo. Depends on the potential. If you can get a guy into the mid 80s I disagree. That ensures the best potential for 2-3 years of good TCs.
|
|
|
Post by josephballin11 on Jun 14, 2022 18:55:05 GMT
Diamond in the rough is too good to use on Potential imo. Depends on the potential. If you can get a guy into the mid 80s I disagree. That ensures the best potential for 2-3 years of good TCs. If he's 18 or 19, I'd only want them above the 73 threshold so they could boom---It's what I did with Ballin but he never Pot boomed ![:(](http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/tears/t2358.gif)
|
|
|
Post by carlos on Jun 14, 2022 18:58:47 GMT
Depends on the potential. If you can get a guy into the mid 80s I disagree. That ensures the best potential for 2-3 years of good TCs. If he's 18 or 19, I'd only want them above the 73 threshold so they could boom---It's what I did with Ballin but he never Pot boomed ![:(](http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/tears/t2358.gif) Every day I learn that I know nothing about this game
|
|
|
Post by cheddar on Jun 14, 2022 19:00:16 GMT
im not a math magician but wouldn't it be more links doing it this way than before ? each player + team + league leaders + awards ? won't need the file on hand though True, it would allow him to be able to provide the info from anywhere. But at the same time, it doesn't really alleviate the time issue.
|
|
|
Post by hunt54 on Jun 14, 2022 19:02:49 GMT
If he's 18 or 19, I'd only want them above the 73 threshold so they could boom---It's what I did with Ballin but he never Pot boomed ![:(](http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/tears/t2358.gif) Every day I learn that I know nothing about this game sidy was in this category and busted pot wise ![:(](http://yoursmiles.org/tsmile/tears/t2358.gif)
|
|